← Back to Insights Waterproofing

Waterproofing Membrane Classes Explained: Rigid, Flexible and Elastomeric

Introduction

Not all waterproofing membranes behave the same way. Under Australian Standards (AS 3740 and AS 4858), membranes are classified into three classes based on their elongation at break — that is, how much they can stretch before tearing. This property, also referred to as the Movement Accommodation Factor (MAF), directly determines where a membrane can and cannot be used.

Getting the class wrong is one of the most common causes of waterproofing failure. A rigid membrane on a substrate that moves will crack. An elastomeric membrane where a rigid one would suffice adds unnecessary cost. This article breaks down each class, the system types within them, and when to use each.

The Three Classes at a Glance

Class	Description	Elongation at Break	Movement Capability
I	Rigid	Less than 60%	Minimal — suitable for stable, monolithic substrates
II	Flexible	60% to 300%	Moderate — accommodates hairline cracking and minor movement
III	Elastomeric	Greater than 300%	High — bridges cracks and tolerates structural movement

Class I: Rigid Systems

Class I membranes have limited stretch and are best suited to substrates with minimal expected movement. They are generally cheaper and simpler to apply, but they will crack if the substrate moves beneath them.

Resin-Based Systems (Fibreglass)

Two-part polyester resins combined with a fibreglass reinforcing mat, applied to form a hard, structural membrane.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Quick to cure if mixed correctly Generally single application High resistance to foot traffic when fully supported	Cannot withstand building movement — brittle Susceptible to osmosis Will not bond to PVC Few compatible adhesives Needs fibreglass reinforcing Requires ventilation and PPE during application

Prefabricated Shower Bases (Moulded or Pressed)

Factory-manufactured shower bases in pressed metal, sanitary grade acrylic, or similar materials.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Factory manufactured — consistent quality Durable Quick to install Pre-finished surfaces	Difficult to achieve a permanent seal at the wall cladding/shower base joint Base sides often do not extend high enough for a satisfactory overflow level Capillary action at perimeters can cause leaks Entrapped moisture under sealed perimeters cannot escape Limited sizes and shapes Full floor waterproofing cannot be installed under the base

Metal Shower Trays (Copper and Stainless Steel)

Prefabricated sheet metal trays installed as an external tray with the wall lining overlaying the tray.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Prefabricated to size Durable and malleable Quick to install	Wall edges commonly only 100mm high (150mm recommended) Capillary action between wall linings and tray face can cause leaks Difficult to render vertical inside faces with sand and cement Dissimilar metal fixings can cause galvanic corrosion Blue metal aggregate in concrete can cause pin-holing Full floor waterproofing cannot be installed under the base

Water-Based Epoxies

Water-based epoxies are generally used as primers and vapour barriers over damp surfaces before applying an acrylic or polyurethane membrane. They are not recommended as the sole waterproofing system in wet areas because they lack flexibility to accommodate movement.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Excellent as a primer over damp porous surfaces Can withstand negative hydrostatic water pressure Some varieties suit autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) surfaces	Cannot withstand movement Not to be used as a primer on non-porous surfaces (steel-trowelled concrete, PVC, mild steel, aluminium) May slow the curing of overlaying liquid membranes

Class II: Flexible Systems

Class II membranes offer moderate elongation and can accommodate hairline cracking and minor building movement. They represent the middle ground — more forgiving than Class I, but without the high-performance stretch of Class III.

Acrylic Membranes

Water-based coatings applied in multiple coats to achieve the required dry film thickness. They generally need a surface primer and must be applied over a dry substrate (less than 8% moisture content). There are three broad categories: those requiring reinforcing added during application, those with reinforcing incorporated in the product, and two-part cement polymer modified systems.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Easy to clean up (water-based) Low toxicity Some are UV stable Compatible with most adhesives	Slow to cure in cold climates Generally requires multiple coats Needs priming Can emulsify if not fully cured, especially at bond breakers Elongation diminished by fibre reinforcing (can revert to Class I characteristics) Can absorb moisture and allow moderate levels of water vapour transmission Fibre reinforcement can wick moisture if not fully encapsulated

Two-part cement polymer modified acrylics will cure more rapidly and are best suited for situations where low movement can be expected, such as over masonry substrates.

Modified Bitumen-Based Emulsions (Water-Based)

These are generally not recommended for internal wet area waterproofing due to the risk of bitumen bleeding through some tiles and most grout joints, causing staining.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Water-based — easier application	Not recommended for wet areas due to bitumen bleeding through tiles and grout Less viscous types tend to self-level, creating runs on vertical surfaces

Bitumen-Based Mastics/Coatings (Solvent-Based)

Like their water-based counterparts, solvent-based bitumen compounds are generally not recommended for internal wet area waterproofing due to bleeding and staining.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Will not emulsify with moisture	Not recommended for wet areas due to bitumen bleeding through tiles and grout Solvent content requires extra OHS precautions

Class III: Elastomeric Systems

Class III membranes offer the highest elongation — over 300% — and are the most capable of bridging cracks and accommodating structural movement. These are the go-to systems for wet areas in most modern construction, and they are required by AS 3740 for internal wet area waterproofing in many applications.

Water-Based Polyurethane

Water-based polyurethane modified acrylics share similar characteristics to Class II acrylic membranes but with significantly greater elongation. They may require priming and the bond breaker must be neutral cure silicone. They can cure within 24 hours but are subject to ventilation, temperature, humidity and porosity of the substrate.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Easy to clean up (water-based) Low toxicity Some are UV stable Compatible with most adhesives	Slow to cure in cold climates May need 2–3 coats to achieve required dry film thickness Needs priming Can emulsify if not fully cured, especially at bond breakers Many varieties not suitable for constant immersion — require positive falls Can absorb moisture, affecting performance characteristics Adding fibre reinforcing can diminish elongation to Class I characteristics

Important: Polyurethane fillets and bond breakers can retard the cure of the membrane. Manufacturers recommend that polyurethane sealants be fully cured before waterproofing is applied.

Solvent-Based Polyurethane

Solvent-based polyurethane systems offer high movement characteristics and usually cure within 24 hours. They are not generally recommended for use over damp substrates and can only be used with specified adhesives. Some contain coal tar or bitumen oils, which can migrate through tile beds and cause staining.

Advantages	Disadvantages
No mixing required Highly flexible and elastomeric Fast cure Little water vapour transmission	Adhesive compatibility limitations Solvent clean-up required Requires water-based epoxy primer over damp substrates Solvent content requires extra OHS precautions in confined spaces Can be difficult to adhere to common tile adhesives Adequate ventilation and PPE essential

Flexible Sheet PVC

PVC sheet membranes are uniform in thickness and can be loose-laid or adhered to all substrates in internal wet areas. The system is compatible with PVC drainage systems and can be permanently bonded to drainage pipes. Lap joints and directional changes are sealed by heat welding or solvent welding.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Uniform thickness throughout Compatible with PVC fittings Can be laid over damp substrates Can be prefabricated Flexible and durable UV stable No curing time — single application	High levels of competence required to install Specialist tools needed Difficult to stick tiles to turn-up of membrane on exposed masonry walls

Sheet Rubber Membranes

Rubber sheet systems are similar in concept to PVC but use rubber-based materials. They are not commonly used in internal wet areas.

Advantages	Disadvantages
Uniform thickness Compatible with PVC fittings Can be laid over damp substrates Can be prefabricated Flexible and durable	High levels of competence required to install Not usually used in internal wet areas Joints may pull apart — taped joints only Loose laid — can shrink over time Can build up thickness at lap joints and corners Difficult to stick tiles to turn-up on masonry walls

Choosing the Right Class

The membrane class should be selected based on the expected movement of the substrate and the application environment:

• Class I (Rigid): Only where the substrate is fully stable and no cracking or movement is anticipated. Best suited as primers, vapour barriers, or prefabricated systems. Not appropriate as the sole membrane in most wet area applications.
• Class II (Flexible): Suitable for substrates with minor anticipated movement, such as masonry walls or well-cured concrete slabs. Acrylic systems are cost-effective for straightforward applications.
• Class III (Elastomeric): Required for most internal wet area waterproofing under AS 3740. Essential where structural movement, cracking, or joint movement is expected. Polyurethane and PVC sheet systems are the most common choices.

Key Takeaways

• The membrane classification is based on elongation at break — how much the membrane stretches before it tears.
• Higher class does not always mean better. It means more flexible. Use the class that matches your substrate and movement conditions.
• Adding fibre reinforcing to a Class II or III membrane can reduce its elongation, effectively downgrading it to a lower class.
• Bitumen-based products (both water and solvent-based) are generally not recommended for internal wet areas due to bleeding and staining risks.
• If using mixed systems (e.g., polyurethane on floors, acrylic on walls), the floor membrane must be applied first so that wall laps overlay the floor membrane.
• Substrate preparation is critical for every class — moisture content, surface profile, priming, and bond breaker compatibility all affect performance.